Check my claim, free Deadline running out

Or message us on Telegram @personalchargeback

$1,730

Recovered including interest

38 months

Payments had been running

5 weeks

To resolution

Challenge

What the client brought us

Our client signed up to a fitness content subscription during a free trial and cancelled inside the trial period using the in-app cancellation flow. He received no confirmation email and thought nothing more about it.

Thirty-eight months later, reviewing his account after changing jobs, he found $45.50 leaving monthly. The trader's position was that no cancellation had ever been received and that he had been free to cancel at any time.

He had no confirmation, no screenshot and no reference number, which is exactly the position an in-app cancellation flow tends to leave people in, and why these claims go unchallenged.

Approach

How we assessed it

We approached it from the bank's side rather than the trader's.

Two months after cancelling he had telephoned his bank to ask about the payments and had been told to contact the merchant. That call was logged. Under the rules on continuous payment authorities, a customer can instruct their bank to stop the payments and the bank must act — it cannot require the customer to resolve matters with the merchant first.

We requested the call recordings and contact notes by subject access request. The notes confirmed both the enquiry and the advice given. That made every payment taken after that date the bank's liability rather than the trader's.

Separately we examined how the trial terms had been presented at sign-up, using an archived version of the page. The auto-renewal disclosure sat below the fold behind a collapsed link, which supports a separate argument about prior information.

Findings

What we found

Critical

Bank told the customer to contact the merchant

A customer can cancel a continuous payment authority through their bank. Telling him otherwise, and not acting, made the subsequent payments the bank's responsibility.

High

No cancellation confirmation issued

The in-app flow produced no email, no reference and no on-screen record. Absence of evidence on the customer's side is not evidence that he did not cancel.

Medium

Auto-renewal disclosure below the fold

The archived sign-up page showed the renewal terms behind a collapsed link, supporting a separate argument on prior information.

Positive finding

The bank's own notes settled it

The contact record was the decisive evidence, and the client had no idea it existed.

Remediation

How it was fixed

We put the claim to the bank for the thirty-six payments taken after the logged call, totalling $1,638 plus interest. The bank accepted liability and paid $1,730 within five weeks, without needing an Ombudsman referral.

The two payments taken before that call were pursued against the trader by chargeback and declined as out of time. We advised that the amount did not justify escalating and he agreed.

We also reviewed his statements for other recurring payments and found two more he had forgotten, worth $22 a month combined. He cancelled those himself and we did not charge for it.

Outcomes

Business result

  • $1,730 recovered for thirty-six payments taken after a logged cancellation enquiry
  • Liability established against the bank rather than an unresponsive trader
  • Two further unwanted subscriptions identified and cancelled at no charge
  • Resolved in five weeks without an Ombudsman referral
“I assumed it was my own fault for not checking. It had not occurred to me that ringing the bank three years ago would be the thing that saved it.”

Client, Bristol

More case outcomes

Home Improvements 14 weeks

$6,200 kitchen deposit recovered from a $200 card payment

The installer took a deposit, missed three start dates, then dissolved the company. The provider initially refused because only $200 of the $6,200 had gone on the credit card, which…

Total recovered
$6,980 Total recovered
Card payment that triggered liability
$200 Card payment that triggered liability
To reverse the initial refusal
11 days To reverse the initial refusal
Read the engagement
Banking and Payments 27 weeks

$19,400 reimbursed after a bank blamed the customer for an impersonation scam

The bank refused reimbursement for gross negligence. It had not identified that the customer was recently bereaved, had not asked, and its warning did not address the scam that actually…

Total recovered including interest
$22,330 Total recovered including interest
Refusals overturned
2 Refusals overturned
From referral to settlement
19 weeks From referral to settlement
Read the engagement
Travel and Holidays 12 weeks

$8,900 recovered after a tour operator collapsed with the holiday unflown

They had been told to register with the administrators and wait. Registering was right; waiting was not. By the time they called us the window on the deposit was almost…

Recovered in full
$8,900 Recovered in full
From first call to filing
4 days From first call to filing
What the clock actually ran from
Travel date What the clock actually ran from
Read the engagement
Next step

Find out where you stand, free.

Tell us what happened. We will tell you whether you have a claim, roughly what it is worth, and whether you would be better off going straight to your bank. That advice costs nothing and carries no obligation.

  • A senior consultant scopes the work, not a salesperson.
  • Fixed-price proposal within three working days.
  • We will tell you if you do not need the engagement you asked for.
  • Every engagement runs against signed authorisation and rules of engagement.
Newsletter

Know your rights before you need them

A short monthly email on consumer money rights: what changed, what it means, and the deadlines worth putting in a diary. No sales pitches, and never more than twelve a year.

You are subscribed.

Look out for the next email at the start of the month.