Ruth Ellery
Managing Director
MCIArb · CeMAP
Eleven years handling complaints inside two high street banks before founding the firm. Ruth set the rule that we tell people when they do not need us, and audits a…
A regulated claims management company that tells two thirds of its enquiries to go and do it themselves, free.
Personal Chargeback was founded in Glasgow in 2016 by two people who had spent years on the other side of the desk, handling complaints for a high street bank. What they saw there was not usually dishonesty. It was that a great many perfectly good claims were declined because the customer did not know which rule applied, could not evidence what they were told at the point of sale, or simply gave up after the first refusal letter.
Almost none of that requires a lawyer. Chargeback is a card scheme process. Section 75 is one section of a 1974 statute. Unauthorised payment claims turn on a regulation that puts the burden of proof on the bank rather than on you. The barrier is knowing that, and being willing to keep going after the first no.
So the firm was built on an uncomfortable premise for a claims company: most people should not use one. We publish the letters, the checklists and the deadline guidance free, and around two thirds of the enquiries we receive are answered with instructions for claiming directly and nothing else. There is no follow-up call, because a claim you can run in an afternoon is not worth paying a percentage on.
The claims we do take on are the ones where that is not true: a bank that has refused twice, a scam with a long paper trail, an insolvent retailer, a purchase where more than one route runs in parallel and the wrong one has already been tried. We are also clear about what we are not. We are not a law firm and we do not conduct litigation. Where a case needs a solicitor, we say so and stop, rather than running a weaker version of it ourselves.
Roughly two thirds of the people who contact us are told how to claim free through their own bank, and sent away with the letter template to do it. There is no follow-up call. If a claim is straightforward enough to run yourself, paying anyone a percentage of it is a poor trade.
If a claim is weak, out of time, or simply not worth the effort it would take you, we say so and close the file. Taking on a case we expect to lose wastes months of somebody else\u2019s life.
Every claim we run cites the specific provision it turns on and the evidence behind it. Where the facts do not support a claim, we say so at the assessment rather than taking it on and quietly letting it fail.
The person who assesses your claim writes the complaint and prepares the Ombudsman submission. You get their direct line and their email, not a case reference and a queue.
Every claim we run is argued from a specific published rule rather than from how unfair the situation feels. These are the ones that come up most, and they are all free for you to read.
Started by two former bank complaint handlers who had spent years declining claims they knew would have succeeded had the customer argued them properly.
Authorised to carry on regulated claims management activity when responsibility for the sector transferred from the Claims Management Regulator to the FCA.
A dedicated team for credit card provider liability claims, after the pandemic left thousands of people holding vouchers for travel that never happened.
Built a scam-reimbursement practice around the Contingent Reimbursement Model, and began publishing our own guidance on what banks were getting wrong.
Adapted the practice to the new mandatory APP reimbursement rules, which shifted the balance decisively towards consumers for in-scope payments.
Extended into card-funded crypto losses and professional negligence, the two areas where people were most often told, wrongly, that nothing could be done.
Published the proportion of enquiries we turn away with self-help instructions, and committed to keeping every template on the site free to download.
The people named here assess claims, write the complaints and prepare Ombudsman submissions. One of them will be your named handler.
Managing Director
MCIArb · CeMAP
Eleven years handling complaints inside two high street banks before founding the firm. Ruth set the rule that we tell people when they do not need us, and audits a…
Head of Card Disputes
CICM
Several thousand chargeback and Section 75 claims. Callum wrote the internal reason-code guidance the whole team works from and retrains everyone whenever the scheme rules change.
Ombudsman Referrals Lead
CILEx Level 3
Prepares every submission that goes to the Financial Ombudsman Service, with a long record of overturning final response letters that looked settled.
Head of Consumer Guidance
Writes the free guides and templates that let people run claims without us. Aware of the tension in that, and considers it the point.
Vulnerable Customer Lead
Reviews every case where a client may be vulnerable and sets the adjustments we make. Came from welfare rights advice and takes a dim view of firms that treat vulnerability…
Compliance Manager
ICA Diploma in Governance, Risk and Compliance
Responsible for our permissions, fee transparency and the quality assurance file. Reads our own marketing before anyone else does, and cuts most of it.
Client Services Manager
Runs the case handler team and owns the promise that you speak to the same person throughout. Watches how long clients wait for a reply and escalates when it slips.
A short monthly email on consumer money rights: what changed, what it means, and the deadlines worth putting in a diary. No sales pitches, and never more than twelve a year.
You are subscribed.
Look out for the next email at the start of the month.